Understudies from Planned Position (SC) and Other In reverse Class (OBC) people group face another obstacle as the Maharashtra government has implemented rigid qualification measures for the Rajarshi Shahu Maharaj Grant, intended to help underestimated understudies seeking after a training abroad.
Under the updated rules, candidates should now accomplish more than 75% in their Optional School Endorsement, Higher Auxiliary Testament, lone ranger's and graduate degrees, denoting a huge increment from the past limits of 55% for SC understudies and 60% for OBC understudies. Also announced are annual funding limits of Rs 30 lakh for master's degrees and Rs 40 lakh for PhD programs, as well as an income cap of Rs 8 lakh per family.
From a pool of approximately 500 applicants, 75 students from the SC and OBC categories are chosen for the scholarship each year. Many first-generation students have found this scholarship to be a lifeline, allowing them to study abroad and improve their families' financial situation. However, many students from economically and socially disadvantaged backgrounds may now be disqualified as a result of the more stringent requirements. After his father's death, Ajinkya, who lives with his mother and brother, manages his household for less than Rs 7 lakh. He has received offers to pursue a master's degree in social research from Manchester University and University College London as an alumni of the Tata Institute for Social Sciences. However, he now fears that his dreams will be dashed by a mere 2% gap in meeting the new requirements. This approach is biased. For understudies like us, getting 60-70% is nothing to joke about. In the event that we had AC rooms as well, envision what we could do," he said.
Vikas Tatad, a previous recipient of the grant, is presently concentrating on in the global and relative schooling program at Columbia College. He was inspired by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, who also studied at Columbia, while he was growing up in a slum. He called the adjustment of the plan "unreasonable" and said it "nullifies the point" of the grant. The presentation of a provision that limits recipients to getting the grant just whenever has made his possibilities of going on with a PhD at Columbia dubious.
"All through these two years, I had arranged, grown an organization and acquired abilities with the expectation that the public authority would have me covered. Presently I'm toward the finish of my course, yet with the adjustment of strategy, I don't have the foggiest idea what will occur straightaway," Tatad made sense of. He expressed concern about the government's annual cap of Rs 30 lakh for master's degrees and Rs 40 lakh for PhD degrees, despite acknowledging the substantial assistance the program provided. My annual costs ranged from Rs 70 lakh to Rs 90 lakh, with 50 to 70 lakh going toward tuition alone. Because no one would lend money to a farmer's son whose home is built on government land, my visa was denied four times.
Raju Kendre, an Indian educator and social activist who is well-known for his efforts to improve education and development in Central India's rural and tribal areas, contributed as well. He is the man who started the Eklavya Global Scholars Program, which helps students from poor families, especially those from rural Maharashtra, get into better educational opportunities.
He stated, "Criteria like 75% become gatekeeping barriers for students from historically marginalized communities if someone is already admitted to top-tier universities like Harvard or LSE." This demonstrates the meritocratic, elitist approach ingrained in our policy systems. Why set a percentage cap if a student is eligible at a foreign university?
Kendre encouraged the public authority to see these understudies as monetary guide recipients as well as future pioneers. " Treat them as worldwide researchers, similar to those upheld by stages like Rhodes, Fulbright, Chevening, DAAD and District. Our nation's future assets are these scholars. In the end, we ought to put money into this human resource."
In addition, the government has been criticized for delaying the release of funds, which resulted in the suspension of the Shahu Maharaj Scholarship at the University of South Wales in Australia. The planning of grant notices, commonly delivered two-three months before the degree begins, seriously restricts understudies' possibilities finding elective money sources. Additionally, the government's tightening of scholarship regulations has left many students uncertain about their educational prospects in the future.
🔍
