Odisha Bandh Called Over School Textbook Errors, Education Issue Draws Attention
A 12-hour Odisha bandh was called on September 30, 2026 as protests intensified over errors found in school textbooks used by students from Classes I to VIII. The Naba Nirman Krushak Sangathan called the statewide shutdown while demanding accountability over the textbook controversy and the resignation of Odisha School and Mass Education Minister Nityananda Gond.
The dispute has developed into a wider education issue after the state government acknowledged that 1,741 errors had been identified across school textbooks. The mistakes range from grammatical, typographical and spelling problems to factual and conceptual inaccuracies, raising questions about the processes used to write, review, approve and print learning material distributed to students.
Odisha Textbook Error Controversy: Key Details
| Particular | Details |
|---|---|
| Bandh Date | September 30, 2026 |
| Duration | 12 Hours |
| Organisation | Naba Nirman Krushak Sangathan |
| Main Issue | Errors in School Textbooks |
| Classes Affected | Classes I to VIII |
| Total Errors Identified | 1,741 |
| Grammar, Typing and Spelling Errors | 1,075 |
| Factual and Conceptual Errors | 5 |
| Printing and Publication Expenditure | About โน175 Crore |
Why Was the Odisha Bandh Called?
The organisation behind the bandh has argued that mistakes in textbooks directly affect students and require stronger accountability from the education administration. Protesters have been raising the matter for several weeks, with the agitation including a relay hunger strike that began in August.
The September 30 bandh brought the education controversy into wider public focus, with demonstrations and road blockades reported in parts of the state. Organisers described the shutdown as peaceful while seeking public support for their demand for action over the textbook issue.
What Types of Errors Were Found?
- Grammatical mistakes in school textbook content.
- Typographical and printing-related errors.
- Spelling mistakes across multiple books.
- Factual inaccuracies requiring correction.
- Conceptual errors affecting educational content.
- Problems identified during subsequent scrutiny and review.
- Additional suggestions for improving textbook quality.
- Errors spread across books prepared for Classes I to VIII.
How Did So Many Textbook Errors Occur?
An inquiry into the preparation process identified shortcomings in the way textbooks were developed and reviewed. The investigation found that textbook writers did not receive formal orientation during the relevant preparation exercise, while subject experts were reportedly given only a limited period to examine final manuscripts.
The inquiry also raised concerns about overlapping responsibilities, with some resource persons participating in several stages of textbook development, including writing, review, proofreading and final examination of material. Such overlap can weaken independent quality checks when the same individuals are repeatedly involved in approving content.
Government Response to the Textbook Issue
The state government has acknowledged the errors and said corrective measures are being taken for revised editions. The number of identified mistakes increased during successive stages of scrutiny, from the figure initially included in a corrigendum to 1,731 during an administrative inquiry and later to 1,741 after further review.
Officials have also indicated that additional fact-checking involving subject and language experts is being introduced to improve future textbooks. Administrative action has been reported against officials connected with the process as the government examines responsibility for the lapses.
Why the Issue Matters for Students
Textbooks remain a primary learning resource for millions of schoolchildren, particularly in government schools. Errors can create confusion for students, make teaching more difficult and require teachers to spend classroom time explaining corrections instead of progressing through lessons.
The Odisha controversy therefore goes beyond a printing dispute. It has drawn attention to textbook quality control, independent proofreading, academic review and the safeguards required before learning material reaches classrooms. The debate is likely to keep education quality and accountability in focus as corrected editions are prepared and authorities consider changes to the textbook-development process.



q.jpg)

